<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Ad Size and Advertising Effectiveness</title> <atom:link href="http://www.dollarshower.com/ad-size-and-advertising-effectiveness/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.dollarshower.com/ad-size-and-advertising-effectiveness/</link> <description>A Blog to Help you Earn Money from Home via Blogging, SEO tips and Internet Marketing strategies</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 17:56:54 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Jignesh</title><link>http://www.dollarshower.com/ad-size-and-advertising-effectiveness/comment-page-1/#comment-20798</link> <dc:creator>Jignesh</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 21:46:19 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dollarshower.com/?p=697#comment-20798</guid> <description>Is my adsproper my Ctr is too low as 0.72 . Suggest some idea</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is my adsproper my Ctr is too low as 0.72 .<br /> Suggest some idea</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ramesh Natarajan</title><link>http://www.dollarshower.com/ad-size-and-advertising-effectiveness/comment-page-1/#comment-11696</link> <dc:creator>Ramesh Natarajan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 05:10:53 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dollarshower.com/?p=697#comment-11696</guid> <description>Ajith,According to &lt;a href=&quot;http://adsense.blogspot.com/2009/09/medium-and-large-rectangle-square-off.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this article from google adsense blog&lt;/a&gt;, medium rectangle may lead to higher earnings over time.I&#039;ve been using only large rectangle on my blog. Probably I should try the medium and see whether it works out better.While I was reading that google article, I suddenly remembered you wrote an article on this subject. So, I search for this and came here to mention about this google article, which may be helpful to others who have not seen it.PS: This shows that I&#039;ve even memorized all your articles. :-) You are doing a fantastic job in educating us on various online money making stuff.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ajith,</p><p>According to <a href="http://adsense.blogspot.com/2009/09/medium-and-large-rectangle-square-off.html" rel="nofollow">this article from google adsense blog</a>, medium rectangle may lead to higher earnings over time.</p><p>I&#8217;ve been using only large rectangle on my blog. Probably I should try the medium and see whether it works out better.</p><p>While I was reading that google article, I suddenly remembered you wrote an article on this subject. So, I search for this and came here to mention about this google article, which may be helpful to others who have not seen it.</p><p>PS: This shows that I&#8217;ve even memorized all your articles. <img src='http://cdn.dollarshower.com/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> You are doing a fantastic job in educating us on various online money making stuff.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ajith Prasad</title><link>http://www.dollarshower.com/ad-size-and-advertising-effectiveness/comment-page-1/#comment-10685</link> <dc:creator>Ajith Prasad</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 15:06:07 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dollarshower.com/?p=697#comment-10685</guid> <description>Your findings are inline with what most us think of text ad and image ad sizes respectively :)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your findings are inline with what most us think of text ad and image ad sizes respectively <img src='http://cdn.dollarshower.com/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ajith Prasad</title><link>http://www.dollarshower.com/ad-size-and-advertising-effectiveness/comment-page-1/#comment-10684</link> <dc:creator>Ajith Prasad</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 15:05:21 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dollarshower.com/?p=697#comment-10684</guid> <description>Mitch, probably the CPA ads that you display on the footer may be still effective with the 468x60 size if they are not looking like a single rectangle with boundaries defined. I also find your RSS footer ads interesting.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mitch, probably the CPA ads that you display on the footer may be still effective with the 468&#215;60 size if they are not looking like a single rectangle with boundaries defined. I also find your RSS footer ads interesting.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ajith Prasad</title><link>http://www.dollarshower.com/ad-size-and-advertising-effectiveness/comment-page-1/#comment-10683</link> <dc:creator>Ajith Prasad</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 15:04:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dollarshower.com/?p=697#comment-10683</guid> <description>The large rectangle is definitely the best text ad form for AdSense as per most publishers</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The large rectangle is definitely the best text ad form for AdSense as per most publishers</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Kurt Avish</title><link>http://www.dollarshower.com/ad-size-and-advertising-effectiveness/comment-page-1/#comment-10636</link> <dc:creator>Kurt Avish</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 13:18:10 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dollarshower.com/?p=697#comment-10636</guid> <description>Seriously am a bit blind to 468 ads myself. I think it depends on the type of ads when it comes to performance. For text ppc i think the 336 block still rules. As for the same size if it is an image it does not covert so well. A skycrapper 160 if image works better.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seriously am a bit blind to 468 ads myself. I think it depends on the type of ads when it comes to performance. For text ppc i think the 336 block still rules. As for the same size if it is an image it does not covert so well. A skycrapper 160 if image works better.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mitch</title><link>http://www.dollarshower.com/ad-size-and-advertising-effectiveness/comment-page-1/#comment-10627</link> <dc:creator>Mitch</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 05:03:47 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dollarshower.com/?p=697#comment-10627</guid> <description>I find it intriguing that most of the responses pretty much slammed what the report had to say without a second thought.In my case, on my blog at the end of each post, I&#039;ve always added either a 468x68 ad or a product of some sort.  I&#039;ve had very few people ever click on the 468x68 ad, so maybe changing it up some to the 24x60 will help.  Can&#039;t hurt.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find it intriguing that most of the responses pretty much slammed what the report had to say without a second thought.</p><p>In my case, on my blog at the end of each post, I&#8217;ve always added either a 468&#215;68 ad or a product of some sort.  I&#8217;ve had very few people ever click on the 468&#215;68 ad, so maybe changing it up some to the 24&#215;60 will help.  Can&#8217;t hurt.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Nihar</title><link>http://www.dollarshower.com/ad-size-and-advertising-effectiveness/comment-page-1/#comment-10617</link> <dc:creator>Nihar</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 20:31:21 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dollarshower.com/?p=697#comment-10617</guid> <description>Nice post. Looks like you have done good research.I don&#039;t know much about other ads performance. But for google Text and Rectangular ads do much better.What do you think?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post. Looks like you have done good research.</p><p>I don&#8217;t know much about other ads performance. But for google Text and Rectangular ads do much better.</p><p>What do you think?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ajith Prasad</title><link>http://www.dollarshower.com/ad-size-and-advertising-effectiveness/comment-page-1/#comment-10318</link> <dc:creator>Ajith Prasad</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 18:35:34 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dollarshower.com/?p=697#comment-10318</guid> <description>I thought so too :) because the number of clicks on my AdSense blocks are more than that of the image banners</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought so too <img src='http://cdn.dollarshower.com/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> because the number of clicks on my AdSense blocks are more than that of the image banners</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Custom Essays</title><link>http://www.dollarshower.com/ad-size-and-advertising-effectiveness/comment-page-1/#comment-10194</link> <dc:creator>Custom Essays</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 20:08:07 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dollarshower.com/?p=697#comment-10194</guid> <description>Text ads are much more effective than banner ads. It generate more clicks with hight conversion ratio.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Text ads are much more effective than banner ads. It generate more clicks with hight conversion ratio.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ajith Prasad</title><link>http://www.dollarshower.com/ad-size-and-advertising-effectiveness/comment-page-1/#comment-10168</link> <dc:creator>Ajith Prasad</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 12:12:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dollarshower.com/?p=697#comment-10168</guid> <description>&lt;strong&gt;@Tushar&lt;/strong&gt;, I thought 468x60 - the longest living banner size - is already outdated and creates more ad blindness than anything else.&lt;strong&gt;@Shanker&lt;/strong&gt;, the question is how big can it get... there has to be a saturation point :)&lt;strong&gt;@Samrat&lt;/strong&gt;, absolutely...especially when it comes to PPC and AdSense blocks.&lt;strong&gt;@Jacques&lt;/strong&gt;, you are right. When it too intrusive the response from the web user is to &#039;just ignore&#039;&lt;strong&gt;@Raju&lt;/strong&gt;, thanks for your inputs. Yes, ads like anything else, need some revolutionary changes and evolve.And everyone seems to be going with the large rectangle for text ads :)&lt;strong&gt;@Jonathan&lt;/strong&gt;, thanks for those inputs. Even, I prefer nicely blended text ads (as a publisher as well as a reader)&lt;strong&gt;@SK&lt;/strong&gt;, yep... nothing can be taken for granted. If a few of our income generators suddenly change, how fast can we adapt is the question!&lt;strong&gt;@Ramesh&lt;/strong&gt;, yes, when it comes to AdSense, it is a perennial topic of discussion. No wonder why Joel Comm etc are making millions.As for the AdSense formats, I did not have much luck with the link ads below the menu and hence I removed them. But I totally endorse the large rectangle. Yet to try leaderboard on the blog.Thank you all for your wonderful inputs!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>@Tushar</strong>, I thought 468&#215;60 &#8211; the longest living banner size &#8211; is already outdated and creates more ad blindness than anything else.</p><p><strong>@Shanker</strong>, the question is how big can it get&#8230; there has to be a saturation point <img src='http://cdn.dollarshower.com/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p><p><strong>@Samrat</strong>, absolutely&#8230;especially when it comes to PPC and AdSense blocks.</p><p><strong>@Jacques</strong>, you are right. When it too intrusive the response from the web user is to &#8216;just ignore&#8217;</p><p><strong>@Raju</strong>, thanks for your inputs. Yes, ads like anything else, need some revolutionary changes and evolve.</p><p>And everyone seems to be going with the large rectangle for text ads <img src='http://cdn.dollarshower.com/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p><p><strong>@Jonathan</strong>, thanks for those inputs. Even, I prefer nicely blended text ads (as a publisher as well as a reader)</p><p><strong>@SK</strong>, yep&#8230; nothing can be taken for granted. If a few of our income generators suddenly change, how fast can we adapt is the question!</p><p><strong>@Ramesh</strong>, yes, when it comes to AdSense, it is a perennial topic of discussion. No wonder why Joel Comm etc are making millions.</p><p>As for the AdSense formats, I did not have much luck with the link ads below the menu and hence I removed them. But I totally endorse the large rectangle. Yet to try leaderboard on the blog.</p><p>Thank you all for your wonderful inputs!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ramesh Natarajan</title><link>http://www.dollarshower.com/ad-size-and-advertising-effectiveness/comment-page-1/#comment-10164</link> <dc:creator>Ramesh Natarajan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 06:56:55 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dollarshower.com/?p=697#comment-10164</guid> <description>Adsense size and location is always tricky subject.I played around with both size and location and for now settled down to following that worked best for my blog:1. Leaderboard next to the logo. 2. Large rectangle inside the content (not at the top!) 3. Large rectangle at the bottom of the post 4. Horizontal link unit right below the menu bar.Note: I also change these depending on what actions I want users to take when they hit the blog. On few months, ads are focus. There are months, when I put subscription as focus. There are months, where the eBook is a focus. So, I change the ad locations accordingly.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adsense size and location is always tricky subject.</p><p>I played around with both size and location and for now settled down to following that worked best for my blog:</p><p>1. Leaderboard next to the logo.<br /> 2. Large rectangle inside the content (not at the top!)<br /> 3. Large rectangle at the bottom of the post<br /> 4. Horizontal link unit right below the menu bar.</p><p>Note: I also change these depending on what actions I want users to take when they hit the blog. On few months, ads are focus. There are months, when I put subscription as focus. There are months, where the eBook is a focus. So, I change the ad locations accordingly.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: binaryday</title><link>http://www.dollarshower.com/ad-size-and-advertising-effectiveness/comment-page-1/#comment-10162</link> <dc:creator>binaryday</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 14:40:21 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dollarshower.com/?p=697#comment-10162</guid> <description>Ajith,Good points there. Goes on to show that we should not take anything for granted and must try out different variations and keep the one that performs the best.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ajith,</p><p>Good points there. Goes on to show that we should not take anything for granted and must try out different variations and keep the one that performs the best.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Prepaid Legal Services</title><link>http://www.dollarshower.com/ad-size-and-advertising-effectiveness/comment-page-1/#comment-10158</link> <dc:creator>Prepaid Legal Services</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 00:35:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dollarshower.com/?p=697#comment-10158</guid> <description>I think the nice thing about blogging platforms is that they&#039;re so customizable.  If someone wants to incorporate one of these new sizes, all they have to do is hire someone on elance to design and install a new template for them.Personally, I look the ads that look like text, and like to blend them into the site layout so they don&#039;t look like ads.That&#039;s created the best results for me.Warmest,Jonathan </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the nice thing about blogging platforms is that they&#8217;re so customizable.  If someone wants to incorporate one of these new sizes, all they have to do is hire someone on elance to design and install a new template for them.</p><p>Personally, I look the ads that look like text, and like to blend them into the site layout so they don&#8217;t look like ads.</p><p>That&#8217;s created the best results for me.</p><p>Warmest,</p><p>Jonathan</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Raju</title><link>http://www.dollarshower.com/ad-size-and-advertising-effectiveness/comment-page-1/#comment-10156</link> <dc:creator>Raju</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 17:48:04 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dollarshower.com/?p=697#comment-10156</guid> <description>Tell me one thing which has not changed on the web over a period of time. Ads are not different either. They have been evolving and will continue to evolve further. The key is to experiment and see what suits you better. For someone who depends on affiliate sales, image ads work better, and for someone who depends on PPC and contextual ads, text links works better. Now to answer your question-1) may be not, but they are not meant to emulate general websites. 2) a big rectangle 3) none :) to choose one, 300x250 is better than others 4) Yeah! may be!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tell me one thing which has not changed on the web over a period of time. Ads are not different either. They have been evolving and will continue to evolve further. The key is to experiment and see what suits you better. For someone who depends on affiliate sales, image ads work better, and for someone who depends on PPC and contextual ads, text links works better. Now to answer your question-</p><p>1) may be not, but they are not meant to emulate general websites.<br /> 2) a big rectangle<br /> 3) none <img src='http://cdn.dollarshower.com/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> to choose one, 300&#215;250 is better than others<br /> 4) Yeah! may be!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jacques Snyman</title><link>http://www.dollarshower.com/ad-size-and-advertising-effectiveness/comment-page-1/#comment-10154</link> <dc:creator>Jacques Snyman</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 17:40:55 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dollarshower.com/?p=697#comment-10154</guid> <description>I find that people tend to ignore the big ads, almost like paging past them in a magazine, so this post makes a lot of sense to me. I have to differ from you on this one, Shanker ;-)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find that people tend to ignore the big ads, almost like paging past them in a magazine, so this post makes a lot of sense to me. I have to differ from you on this one, Shanker <img src='http://cdn.dollarshower.com/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Samrat P</title><link>http://www.dollarshower.com/ad-size-and-advertising-effectiveness/comment-page-1/#comment-10153</link> <dc:creator>Samrat P</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 17:37:52 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dollarshower.com/?p=697#comment-10153</guid> <description>Rather than using BIGGER ads it would be better to use better ad designs..... better placements.... and valuable ads....</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rather than using BIGGER ads it would be better to use better ad designs&#8230;.. better placements&#8230;. and valuable ads&#8230;.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Make Money Online Blogging</title><link>http://www.dollarshower.com/ad-size-and-advertising-effectiveness/comment-page-1/#comment-10150</link> <dc:creator>Make Money Online Blogging</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 13:51:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dollarshower.com/?p=697#comment-10150</guid> <description>A lot of study has been done on this subject , i can only say &#039; bigger is better&#039;-Shanker Bakshi</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A lot of study has been done on this subject , i can only say &#8216; bigger is better&#8217;</p><p>-Shanker Bakshi</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: IndianCashMaker</title><link>http://www.dollarshower.com/ad-size-and-advertising-effectiveness/comment-page-1/#comment-10149</link> <dc:creator>IndianCashMaker</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 13:37:28 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dollarshower.com/?p=697#comment-10149</guid> <description>for me...there is nothing more effective than a 468 x 80 ad banner...image ad works best and if it is a animated ad, you hit the bull&#039;s eye</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>for me&#8230;there is nothing more effective than a 468 x 80 ad banner&#8230;image ad works best and if it is a animated ad, you hit the bull&#8217;s eye</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
