<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Sitelinks: Google could do more about it</title> <atom:link href="http://www.dollarshower.com/sitelinks-google-could-do-more-about-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.dollarshower.com/sitelinks-google-could-do-more-about-it/</link> <description>A Blog to Help you Earn Money from Home via Blogging, SEO tips and Internet Marketing strategies</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 17:56:54 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Ajith Prasad</title><link>http://www.dollarshower.com/sitelinks-google-could-do-more-about-it/comment-page-1/#comment-10681</link> <dc:creator>Ajith Prasad</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 15:00:34 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dollarshower.com/?p=658#comment-10681</guid> <description>Hmm... I didn&#039;t think about that search angle. In that case we can also do self-search right? :lol:</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm&#8230; I didn&#8217;t think about that search angle. In that case we can also do self-search right? <img src='http://cdn.dollarshower.com/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_lol.gif' alt=':lol:' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ajith Prasad</title><link>http://www.dollarshower.com/sitelinks-google-could-do-more-about-it/comment-page-1/#comment-10680</link> <dc:creator>Ajith Prasad</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 14:59:52 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dollarshower.com/?p=658#comment-10680</guid> <description>It might take a while... But trust me, it will appear sometime but what you get to see there may not be always the desirable links.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It might take a while&#8230; But trust me, it will appear sometime but what you get to see there may not be always the desirable links.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Kurt Avish</title><link>http://www.dollarshower.com/sitelinks-google-could-do-more-about-it/comment-page-1/#comment-10634</link> <dc:creator>Kurt Avish</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 13:15:23 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dollarshower.com/?p=658#comment-10634</guid> <description>I have sitelinks to my blog too. I got them after nearly 8 months of blogging. I think it also depends on the amount of time your blog title is searched for.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have sitelinks to my blog too. I got them after nearly 8 months of blogging. I think it also depends on the amount of time your blog title is searched for.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Custom Essays</title><link>http://www.dollarshower.com/sitelinks-google-could-do-more-about-it/comment-page-1/#comment-10197</link> <dc:creator>Custom Essays</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 20:11:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dollarshower.com/?p=658#comment-10197</guid> <description>Google has indexed all the pages of my website but search results do not show any side links. I think, it has to do something with site map.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google has indexed all the pages of my website but search results do not show any side links. I think, it has to do something with site map.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ajith Prasad</title><link>http://www.dollarshower.com/sitelinks-google-could-do-more-about-it/comment-page-1/#comment-10165</link> <dc:creator>Ajith Prasad</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 11:48:19 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dollarshower.com/?p=658#comment-10165</guid> <description>Yep Jacques, I really hope that they will listen and improve the same. At least, they are a lot better than Yahoo on the &#039;listening&#039; part :)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep Jacques, I really hope that they will listen and improve the same. At least, they are a lot better than Yahoo on the &#8216;listening&#8217; part <img src='http://cdn.dollarshower.com/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jacques Snyman</title><link>http://www.dollarshower.com/sitelinks-google-could-do-more-about-it/comment-page-1/#comment-10161</link> <dc:creator>Jacques Snyman</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 12:27:38 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dollarshower.com/?p=658#comment-10161</guid> <description>The great thing about Google ios that they listen, and if enough people harp on a common subject they will pay attention to it. Perhaps getting the sitelinks you&#039;d like visible on the returned searech engine results entail building quality links to the targeted pages. We know their algorithm is driven by links, big time.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The great thing about Google ios that they listen, and if enough people harp on a common subject they will pay attention to it. Perhaps getting the sitelinks you&#8217;d like visible on the returned searech engine results entail building quality links to the targeted pages. We know their algorithm is driven by links, big time.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ajith Prasad</title><link>http://www.dollarshower.com/sitelinks-google-could-do-more-about-it/comment-page-1/#comment-10142</link> <dc:creator>Ajith Prasad</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 09:09:31 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dollarshower.com/?p=658#comment-10142</guid> <description>Thanks Chris for the compliments!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Chris for the compliments!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Chris Peterson</title><link>http://www.dollarshower.com/sitelinks-google-could-do-more-about-it/comment-page-1/#comment-10063</link> <dc:creator>Chris Peterson</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 11:21:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dollarshower.com/?p=658#comment-10063</guid> <description>Ajith, simplified language &amp; engaging description of interesting feature, sure one with open eyes will be able to take advantage of it, great value to your viewers!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ajith, simplified language &amp; engaging description of interesting feature, sure one with open eyes will be able to take advantage of it, great value to your viewers!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ajith Prasad</title><link>http://www.dollarshower.com/sitelinks-google-could-do-more-about-it/comment-page-1/#comment-10056</link> <dc:creator>Ajith Prasad</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 08:31:53 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dollarshower.com/?p=658#comment-10056</guid> <description>&lt;strong&gt;@Divyun&lt;/strong&gt;, That&#039;s great.. You should be getting sitelinks for other keyword searches as well :)&lt;strong&gt;@BlogrPro&lt;/strong&gt;, exactly... the problem is that there&#039;s no way to tell Google which one to list. Google provides us option only to delete some links.&lt;strong&gt;@Pavan&lt;/strong&gt;, thanks for summarizing the evolution of sitelinks. Personally I believe that it gives a very good consolidated view of a site if done properly.&lt;strong&gt;@Tushar&lt;/strong&gt;, it doesn&#039;t take too long before you get there&lt;strong&gt;@Raju&lt;/strong&gt;, &#039;mystery&#039; is the right term for sitelinks :)&lt;strong&gt;@Suresh&lt;/strong&gt;, we all like it...only if they were showing good links...&lt;strong&gt;@Arun&lt;/strong&gt;, same for me...  But I checked out shoutmeloud... Google has listed his about page, services etc&lt;strong&gt;@Nihar&lt;/strong&gt;, that&#039;s what.. The Google Webmaster Tools should have some option for the same...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>@Divyun</strong>, That&#8217;s great.. You should be getting sitelinks for other keyword searches as well <img src='http://cdn.dollarshower.com/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p><p><strong>@BlogrPro</strong>, exactly&#8230; the problem is that there&#8217;s no way to tell Google which one to list. Google provides us option only to delete some links.</p><p><strong>@Pavan</strong>, thanks for summarizing the evolution of sitelinks. Personally I believe that it gives a very good consolidated view of a site if done properly.</p><p><strong>@Tushar</strong>, it doesn&#8217;t take too long before you get there</p><p><strong>@Raju</strong>, &#8216;mystery&#8217; is the right term for sitelinks <img src='http://cdn.dollarshower.com/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p><p><strong>@Suresh</strong>, we all like it&#8230;only if they were showing good links&#8230;</p><p><strong>@Arun</strong>, same for me&#8230;  But I checked out shoutmeloud&#8230; Google has listed his about page, services etc</p><p><strong>@Nihar</strong>, that&#8217;s what.. The Google Webmaster Tools should have some option for the same&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Nihar</title><link>http://www.dollarshower.com/sitelinks-google-could-do-more-about-it/comment-page-1/#comment-10051</link> <dc:creator>Nihar</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 14:48:25 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dollarshower.com/?p=658#comment-10051</guid> <description>Ajith, One more great post.I would like google to have a feature in WebMasters where you can actually suggest them to add so on so link to Site Links. Instead they pick randomly...What do you think?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ajith, One more great post.</p><p>I would like google to have a feature in WebMasters where you can actually suggest them to add so on so link to Site Links. Instead they pick randomly&#8230;</p><p>What do you think?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Arun Basil Lal</title><link>http://www.dollarshower.com/sitelinks-google-could-do-more-about-it/comment-page-1/#comment-10034</link> <dc:creator>Arun Basil Lal</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 19:28:20 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dollarshower.com/?p=658#comment-10034</guid> <description>Google has a really random way of assigning sitelinks, mine are not at all the core posts or pages. Moreover those pages are no the ones that get traffic either. Doesn&#039;t really help in branding.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google has a really random way of assigning sitelinks, mine are not at all the core posts or pages. Moreover those pages are no the ones that get traffic either. Doesn&#8217;t really help in branding.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Surender Sharma</title><link>http://www.dollarshower.com/sitelinks-google-could-do-more-about-it/comment-page-1/#comment-10032</link> <dc:creator>Surender Sharma</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 17:30:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dollarshower.com/?p=658#comment-10032</guid> <description>But it is depend upon the web owners whether he likes or not. For me site links are best.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But it is depend upon the web owners whether he likes or not.<br /> For me site links are best.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Raju</title><link>http://www.dollarshower.com/sitelinks-google-could-do-more-about-it/comment-page-1/#comment-10029</link> <dc:creator>Raju</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 04:09:39 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dollarshower.com/?p=658#comment-10029</guid> <description>I completely agree with you here. Sitelinks is still a mystery for most webmasters. It picks up some weird anchor texts from posts which have hardly got any traffic.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I completely agree with you here. Sitelinks is still a mystery for most webmasters. It picks up some weird anchor texts from posts which have hardly got any traffic.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: IndianCashMaker</title><link>http://www.dollarshower.com/sitelinks-google-could-do-more-about-it/comment-page-1/#comment-10026</link> <dc:creator>IndianCashMaker</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 13:07:16 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dollarshower.com/?p=658#comment-10026</guid> <description>sitelinks is an awesome feature of Google..i wonder when will my blog get sitelinks....</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sitelinks is an awesome feature of Google..i wonder when will my blog get sitelinks&#8230;.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Pavan Kumar</title><link>http://www.dollarshower.com/sitelinks-google-could-do-more-about-it/comment-page-1/#comment-10024</link> <dc:creator>Pavan Kumar</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 11:45:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dollarshower.com/?p=658#comment-10024</guid> <description>I have been observing strange developments in sitelinks. When I was new to blogging, sitelinks used to appear only for first result. Then started site based search feature added below sitelinks for high authority sites. Later on they introduced single line sitelinks for comparatively low authority sites / pages. Now I see sitelinks appear even for non 1st result on SERP, and single line sitelinks appear even on following result pages.I have also observed sites which have got sitelinks for single page. Like wikipedia and all, the internal page navigation links (anchors like top, bottom, history, links which stay in a single page etc).Google should concentrate on providing sitelinks in a faster way when we block a link on wm tools.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been observing strange developments in sitelinks. When I was new to blogging, sitelinks used to appear only for first result. Then started site based search feature added below sitelinks for high authority sites. Later on they introduced single line sitelinks for comparatively low authority sites / pages. Now I see sitelinks appear even for non 1st result on SERP, and single line sitelinks appear even on following result pages.</p><p>I have also observed sites which have got sitelinks for single page. Like wikipedia and all, the internal page navigation links (anchors like top, bottom, history, links which stay in a single page etc).</p><p>Google should concentrate on providing sitelinks in a faster way when we block a link on wm tools.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: BlogrPro</title><link>http://www.dollarshower.com/sitelinks-google-could-do-more-about-it/comment-page-1/#comment-10023</link> <dc:creator>BlogrPro</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 11:25:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dollarshower.com/?p=658#comment-10023</guid> <description>Yes. Sometimes Google is showing unwanted pages in sitelinks.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes. Sometimes Google is showing unwanted pages in sitelinks.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Divyun @ Webmasters blog</title><link>http://www.dollarshower.com/sitelinks-google-could-do-more-about-it/comment-page-1/#comment-10021</link> <dc:creator>Divyun @ Webmasters blog</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 10:54:19 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dollarshower.com/?p=658#comment-10021</guid> <description>I think sitelinks is a wonderful feature which gives more exposure to a relevant site. I suppose when a site has more than one reference to a keyword then that&#039;s when these appear. eg. When I search for &quot;divyun.com&quot; it results with my site at the top with the sitelinks because it has lots of reference to divyun.com. lol</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think sitelinks is a wonderful feature which gives more exposure to a relevant site. I suppose when a site has more than one reference to a keyword then that&#8217;s when these appear.<br /> eg. When I search for &#8220;divyun.com&#8221; it results with my site at the top with the sitelinks because it has lots of reference to divyun.com. lol</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
